Re: [PATCH v6 00/39] Lockfile correctness and refactoring

2014-09-30 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 09/26/2014 06:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael Haggerty writes: > >> * Rebase to current master. > > When you say this, could you be a bit more descriptive? Has the > series updated to use something new that appeared on 'master' since > the last series was posted and needed to be rebas

Re: [PATCH v6 00/39] Lockfile correctness and refactoring

2014-09-26 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael Haggerty writes: > Next iteration of my lockfile fixes and refactoring. Thanks to > Jonathan Nieder and Torsten Bögershausen for their comments about v5. > > I believe that this series addresses all of the comments from v1 [1], > v2 [2], v3 [3], v4 [4], and v5 [5]. Looked quite good. Wi

Re: [PATCH v6 00/39] Lockfile correctness and refactoring

2014-09-26 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael Haggerty writes: > * Rebase to current master. When you say this, could you be a bit more descriptive? Has the series updated to use something new that appeared on 'master' since the last series was posted and needed to be rebased? Or did you just made sure that the series applied on t

[PATCH v6 00/39] Lockfile correctness and refactoring

2014-09-26 Thread Michael Haggerty
Next iteration of my lockfile fixes and refactoring. Thanks to Jonathan Nieder and Torsten Bögershausen for their comments about v5. I believe that this series addresses all of the comments from v1 [1], v2 [2], v3 [3], v4 [4], and v5 [5]. Changes since v4: * Revise API documentation. * Split ou