Junio C Hamano writes:
> Christian Couder writes:
>
>> +obj_type = sha1_object_info(object, NULL);
>> +repl_type = sha1_object_info(repl, NULL);
>
> That we can do this is somewhat curious
Note that this was a comment on the sha1_object_info() API, which,
unlike read_sha1_file() API
Christian Couder writes:
> + obj_type = sha1_object_info(object, NULL);
> + repl_type = sha1_object_info(repl, NULL);
That we can do this is somewhat curious. If an object is replaced
with a different one, would it mean that this code snippet is
totally bogus?
type1 = sha1_obje
Users replacing an object with one of a different type were not
prevented to do so, even if it was obvious, and stated in the doc,
that bad things would result from doing that.
To avoid mistakes, it is better to just forbid that though.
If -f option, which means '--force', is used, we can allow a
3 matches
Mail list logo
