On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Chris Webb wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> Implemented now. I'm not handling the 'tip' revision, but most likely
>> it's also the '.' revision. In this case a fake 'master' bookmark will
>> be created to track that revision.
>
> Hi Felipe. Sorry for the sl
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Implemented now. I'm not handling the 'tip' revision, but most likely
> it's also the '.' revision. In this case a fake 'master' bookmark will
> be created to track that revision.
Hi Felipe. Sorry for the slow response, I've been snowed under with work and
have only ju
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Chris Webb wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> Yes, it seems this is an API issue; repo.branchtip doesn't exist in
>> python 2.2.
>
> Hi. Presumably this is a problem with old mercurial not a problem with old
> python as mentioned in the commit?
Yeah, mercuria
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Chris Webb wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> Yes, it seems this is an API issue; repo.branchtip doesn't exist in
>> python 2.2.
>
> Hi. Presumably this is a problem with old mercurial not a problem with old
> python as mentioned in the commit?
>
>> Both issue
Chris Webb writes:
> A common idiom when working with hg bookmarks is to completely ignore the
> (not very useful) hg branches (i.e. all commits are on the default hg
> branch) and have a bookmark for each line of development used exactly as a
> git branch would be.
>
> On such a repository, at
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Yes, it seems this is an API issue; repo.branchtip doesn't exist in
> python 2.2.
Hi. Presumably this is a problem with old mercurial not a problem with old
python as mentioned in the commit?
> Both issues should be fixed now :)
They are indeed, and it now works nice
Hi Chris,
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Chris Webb wrote:
> I routinely work with projects in both hg and git, so I'm really
> interested in this. Thanks for working on it! I grabbed the latest
> version from
>
>
> https://github.com/felipec/git/blob/fc-remote-hg/contrib/remote-hg/git-remote-hg
>
> a
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Chris Webb wrote:
> Hi. I routinely work with projects in both hg and git, so I'm really
> interested in this. Thanks for working on it! I grabbed the latest version
> from
>
>
> https://github.com/felipec/git/blob/fc-remote-hg/contrib/remote-hg/git-remote-hg
>
Chris Webb writes:
> The first is really a symptom of a general difference between hg and git: an
> hg
> repository can have multiple heads, whereas a git repo has exactly one head.
By this I mean an hg repository without bookmarks or branches can still have
multiple heads, whereas a git branch
Hi. I routinely work with projects in both hg and git, so I'm really
interested in this. Thanks for working on it! I grabbed the latest version
from
https://github.com/felipec/git/blob/fc-remote-hg/contrib/remote-hg/git-remote-hg
and have been trying it out. For the most part, it seems to work
Hi,
I've ported the tests from hg-git and made sure that the output from remote-hg
matches the output of hg-git. With these extensive tests I would consider this
one ready for wide use. Not only do the tests pass, I've compared the generated
repos of a few projects, and the SHA-1's are exactly the
11 matches
Mail list logo
