Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] stash: support pathspec argument

2017-02-17 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thomas Gummerer writes: > On 02/17, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Thomas Gummerer writes: >> >> [some people may see this message twice, as I forgot to check if the >> copy I received had "Some A . Body" not enclosed in dq; blindly >> doing "Reply-All" ended up listing an invalid address on my Cc: l

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] stash: support pathspec argument

2017-02-17 Thread Thomas Gummerer
On 02/17, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Thomas Gummerer writes: > > [some people may see this message twice, as I forgot to check if the > copy I received had "Some A . Body" not enclosed in dq; blindly > doing "Reply-All" ended up listing an invalid address on my Cc: line > and dropped by vger. apolog

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] stash: support pathspec argument

2017-02-17 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thomas Gummerer writes: [some people may see this message twice, as I forgot to check if the copy I received had "Some A . Body" not enclosed in dq; blindly doing "Reply-All" ended up listing an invalid address on my Cc: line and dropped by vger. apologies] > diff --git a/git-stash.sh b/git-stas

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] stash: support pathspec argument

2017-02-17 Thread Thomas Gummerer
On 02/17, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Thomas Gummerer writes: > > > Thanks Matthieu, Peff and Junio for the discussion on v3 and v4. > > > > Changes since v4: > > Dropped patch 1 from the series, as it's already in master > > > > Instead of changing the external interface to git stash create, only >

[PATCH v5 0/6] stash: support pathspec argument

2017-02-17 Thread Thomas Gummerer
Thanks Matthieu, Peff and Junio for the discussion on v3 and v4. Changes since v4: Dropped patch 1 from the series, as it's already in master Instead of changing the external interface to git stash create, only refactor the internal create_stash() function to take -m and -u arguments. This also