Hi Marat,
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Marat Radchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 12:11:01PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > I also added one patch I find highly convenient:
> >
> > https://github.com/dscho/git/commit/29749c7d7b4638c63369d6cf067f5d524d0092f9
>
> There already were two attemp
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 12:11:01PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> I also added one patch I find highly convenient:
>
> https://github.com/dscho/git/commit/29749c7d7b4638c63369d6cf067f5d524d0092f9
There already were two attempts to this issue:
1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg230028.h
Hi all,
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Marat Radchenko wrote:
> This patch series fixes building on modern MinGW and MinGW-W64
> (including x86_64).
To make it more convenient to work on this patch series using Git, I
pushed this branch to
https://github.com/dscho/git/compare/git:master...w64-slon
Marat Radchenko writes:
> This patch series fixes building on modern MinGW and MinGW-W64 (including
> x86_64).
As Dscho explained in a sub-thread, I really do not want to bypass
msysgit folks when dealing with things that relate to Windows, for
at least two reasons:
* I can be a patch monkey
This patch series fixes building on modern MinGW and MinGW-W64 (including
x86_64).
*Compilation* tested on:
- MSVC
- msysGit environment (twice)
- Linux cross-toolchain i686-pc-mingw32
- Linux cross-toolchain i686-w64-mingw32
- Linux cross-toolchain x86_64-w64-mingw32
Also, this patchset is
5 matches
Mail list logo