On Thursday 14 December 2017 11:32 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
Looks alright.
It was made unnecessarily harder to review because it was marked as
2/2, even though this no longer applies on top of the copy of 1/2
that was merged some time ago.
Sorry about that but I don
Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
> With the `--branch` option, the command takes a name and checks if
> -it can be used as a valid branch name (e.g. when creating a new
> -branch). The rule `git check-ref-format --branch $name` implements
> -may be stricter than what `git check-ref-format refs/heads/$n
When the N-th previous thing checked out syntax (@{-N}) is used
with '--branch' option of check-ref-format the result may not be
the name of a branch that currently exists or ever existed. This
is because @{-N} is used to refer to the N-th last checked out
"thing", which might be a commit object na
3 matches
Mail list logo
