Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] worktree.c: add find_worktree()

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Ramsay Jones wrote: > > > On 03/06/16 13:19, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: >> So far we haven't needed to identify an existing worktree from command >> line. Future commands such as lock or move will need it. The current >> implementation identifies worktrees by path

Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] worktree.c: add find_worktree()

On 03/06/16 13:19, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: > So far we haven't needed to identify an existing worktree from command > line. Future commands such as lock or move will need it. The current > implementation identifies worktrees by path (*). In future, the function > could learn to identify by $(

[PATCH v4 1/6] worktree.c: add find_worktree()

So far we haven't needed to identify an existing worktree from command line. Future commands such as lock or move will need it. The current implementation identifies worktrees by path (*). In future, the function could learn to identify by $(basename $path) or tags... (*) We could probably go chea