On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Eric Sunshine
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>>> wrote:
In the previous patch, git_snpath() is modified to allocat
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>> wrote:
>>> In the previous patch, git_snpath() is modified to allocate a new
>>> strbuf buffer because vsnpath() needs that. But th
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> wrote:
>> In the previous patch, git_snpath() is modified to allocate a new
>> strbuf buffer because vsnpath() needs that. But that makes it awkward
>> because git_snpath() receives a pr
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> In the previous patch, git_snpath() is modified to allocate a new
> strbuf buffer because vsnpath() needs that. But that makes it awkward
> because git_snpath() receives a pre-allocated buffer from outside and
> has to copy data back. R
In the previous patch, git_snpath() is modified to allocate a new
strbuf buffer because vsnpath() needs that. But that makes it awkward
because git_snpath() receives a pre-allocated buffer from outside and
has to copy data back. Rename it to strbuf_git_path() and make it
receive strbuf directly.
T
5 matches
Mail list logo