On 07/09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer writes:
>
> > Maybe it would be even better to name it 'struct gitdiff_data', as
> > it's really only used for those few functions?
>
> Is it really the case where "these three are only used by the
> codepath you made public"? If so, I agree tha
Thomas Gummerer writes:
> Maybe it would be even better to name it 'struct gitdiff_data', as
> it's really only used for those few functions?
Is it really the case where "these three are only used by the
codepath you made public"? If so, I agree that "gitdiff_data" is a
perfectly good name for
On 07/09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer writes:
>
> > Make parse_git_header a "public" function in apply.h, so we can re-use
> > it in range-diff in a subsequent commit.
Eek, I just noticed that I forgot updating the name here. This and
the Subject should say 'parse_git_diff_header()'
Thomas Gummerer writes:
> Make parse_git_header a "public" function in apply.h, so we can re-use
> it in range-diff in a subsequent commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer
> ---
Thanks for these refactoring patches on "apply" machinery in the
early part of the series. I noticed two small th
Make parse_git_header a "public" function in apply.h, so we can re-use
it in range-diff in a subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer
---
apply.c | 69 -
apply.h | 48 +++
2 files changed, 67 ins
5 matches
Mail list logo