On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> Perhaps a preparatory patch needs to rename the structure type to
>> object_name_list or something. And then we can make the variable
>> names, not typenames, responsible for signalling what they mean,
>> i.e.
>
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Perhaps a preparatory patch needs to rename the structure type to
> object_name_list or something. And then we can make the variable
> names, not typenames, responsible for signalling what they mean,
> i.e.
>
> get_remote_heads(...
> struct list_of_ob
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
> No callers pass a non-empty pointer as shallow_points at this
> stage. As a result, all clients still refuse to talk to shallow
> repository on the other end.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> ---
> builtin/fetch-pack.c | 2 +-
> builtin/send-pack.c |
No callers pass a non-empty pointer as shallow_points at this
stage. As a result, all clients still refuse to talk to shallow
repository on the other end.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
builtin/fetch-pack.c | 2 +-
builtin/send-pack.c | 2 +-
connect.c| 12 +++-
r
4 matches
Mail list logo