"brian m. carlson" writes:
> If Junio would like to add my sign-off to the end, he's welcome to do
> so:
>
> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson
Heh, too late.
Thanks for explaining the true flow of patches, though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:37:29AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:40 PM, brian m. carlson
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:34:59PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> [PATCH 01/56] was authored by you but has Michael's sign-off, which
> >> looked somewhat odd to me,
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:40 PM, brian m. carlson
wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:34:59PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> [PATCH 01/56] was authored by you but has Michael's sign-off, which
>> looked somewhat odd to me, though.
>
> Yes, it does. He picked it up from me, and signed off, and I
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:34:59PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> [PATCH 01/56] was authored by you but has Michael's sign-off, which
> looked somewhat odd to me, though.
Yes, it does. He picked it up from me, and signed off, and I took his
branch. I don't believe he changed it, but I didn't che
"brian m. carlson" writes:
> Changes from v2:
> * Adopt Michael Haggerty's patch series that uses an adapter function.
> * Squash some of these patches together where it makes sense in order to
> reduce the quantity of patches.
>
> This does only slightly more than my original series, just in a
This is a conversion of parts of refs.c to use struct object_id.
refs.c, and the for_each_ref series of functions explicitly, is the
source for many instances of object IDs in the codebase. Therefore, it
makes sense to convert this series of functions to provide a basis for
further conversions.
6 matches
Mail list logo
