Duy Nguyen writes:
>> I think the message should better say "before you started to bisect
>> you were on 'jch'" or something instead.
>
> How about
>
> * (no branch, bisect started on jch)
>
> then?
Sure.
What you are showing is used only to decide where "git bisect reset"
goes to, I think.
--
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I was running "git bisect start pu jch" (jch is a branch I do not
> push out everywhere that is somewhere in the middle of
> "master..pu"), and then after bisection finished, saw this:
>
> $ git branch --with 66887099e096f0258a5ef3b1e745
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
> This round fixes the design issue of read_and_strip_branch(), makes
> use of jc/reflog-reverse-walk and performs cheaper sha-1 check on
> detached commits.
I was running "git bisect start pu jch" (jch is a branch I do not
push out everywhere that is somewhere in t
This round fixes the design issue of read_and_strip_branch(), makes
use of jc/reflog-reverse-walk and performs cheaper sha-1 check on
detached commits.
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy (5):
wt-status: move strbuf into read_and_strip_branch()
wt-status: split wt_status_state parsing function out
wt-statu
4 matches
Mail list logo
