On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 01:04:32AM -0700, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> > After looking at the patches I suspect this should be a single patch.
> > That way it's bisectable, and the changes outside of read-cache.c are
> > small enough that it's not too much of a burden to review as a single
> > patch.
Jonathan,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:14:07PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
>
> > Jeremiah Mahler (5):
> > cache: rename cache_name_compare() to name_compare()
> > tree-walk.c: remove name_compare() function
> > unpack-trees.c: remove name_compare() function
> > di
Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> Jeremiah Mahler (5):
> cache: rename cache_name_compare() to name_compare()
> tree-walk.c: remove name_compare() function
> unpack-trees.c: remove name_compare() function
> dir.c: rename to name_compare()
> name-hash.c: rename to name_compare()
>
> cache.h
Version 3 of the patch series to cleanup duplicate name_compare()
functions (previously was 'add strnncmp() function' [1]).
This version goes in a slightly different direction than the previous
version. Before I was trying to add a strnncmp() function so I could
remove duplicate copies of the n
4 matches
Mail list logo