Erik Faye-Lund writes:
> As far as I'm concerned, I consider this complete from my point of
> view. Should I send out a new version with the fixup squashed in?
I've already queued them as one commit. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a mess
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Erik Faye-Lund writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>>> Since the Windows port of Git expects binary pipes, we need to make
>>> sure the helper-end also sets up binary pipes.
>>>
>>> Side-step CRLF-issue in t
Erik Faye-Lund writes:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>> Since the Windows port of Git expects binary pipes, we need to make
>> sure the helper-end also sets up binary pipes.
>>
>> Side-step CRLF-issue in test to make it pass.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
>> ---
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> Since the Windows port of Git expects binary pipes, we need to make
> sure the helper-end also sets up binary pipes.
>
> Side-step CRLF-issue in test to make it pass.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
> ---
>
> Sorry for the delay, but here
Since the Windows port of Git expects binary pipes, we need to make
sure the helper-end also sets up binary pipes.
Side-step CRLF-issue in test to make it pass.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
---
Sorry for the delay, but here's the third iteration of my credential
helper for Windows' credential
5 matches
Mail list logo
