Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] date: document and test "raw-local" mode

2016-07-27 Thread Jakub Narębski
W dniu 2016-07-26 o 20:47, Jeff King pisze: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 12:15:37PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote: > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt >>> b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt >>> index 5d1de06..3ec75d4 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt >>> +++ b/Doc

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] date: document and test "raw-local" mode

2016-07-26 Thread Jeff King
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 12:15:37PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote: > > diff --git a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt > > b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt > > index 5d1de06..3ec75d4 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt > > @@ -725,8 +7

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] date: document and test "raw-local" mode

2016-07-23 Thread Jakub Narębski
W dniu 2016-07-22 o 21:51, Jeff King pisze: > The "raw" format shows a Unix epoch timestamp, but with a > timezone tacked on. The timestamp is not _in_ that zone, but > it is extra information about the time (by default, the zone > the author was in). I would say that "Unix time" (name according

[PATCH v2 5/6] date: document and test "raw-local" mode

2016-07-22 Thread Jeff King
The "raw" format shows a Unix epoch timestamp, but with a timezone tacked on. The timestamp is not _in_ that zone, but it is extra information about the time (by default, the zone the author was in). The documentation claims that "raw-local" does not work. It does, but the end result is rather sub