Re: [PATCH v2 21/25] rev-list: add --index-objects option

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:12:31PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > "--indexed-objects" (short for "--show-objects-in-the-index") or > > something? > > That sounds reasonable. We could technically do `--indexed` as that is > different from `--index`, but maybe they are still confusingly close. Here's

Re: [PATCH v2 21/25] rev-list: add --index-objects option

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:41:35AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I agree that "--index" is a bad name as it usually is used in a > particular context: the command can work on various combination of > working tree and the index, and I am asking it to work on both > (e.g. "apply --index" as opposed

Re: [PATCH v2 21/25] rev-list: add --index-objects option

Jeff King writes: > There is currently no easy way to ask the revision traversal > machinery to include objects reachable from the index (e.g., > blobs and trees that have not yet been committed). This > patch adds an option to do so. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King > --- > I was tempted to call th

[PATCH v2 21/25] rev-list: add --index-objects option

There is currently no easy way to ask the revision traversal machinery to include objects reachable from the index (e.g., blobs and trees that have not yet been committed). This patch adds an option to do so. Signed-off-by: Jeff King --- I was tempted to call this just "--index", because I could