Re: [PATCH v2 16/27] t1400: Test one mistake at a time

2014-03-31 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 03/31/2014 11:50 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael Haggerty writes: > >> This case wants to test passing a bad refname to the "update" command. >> But it also passes too few arguments to "update", which muddles the >> situation: which error should be diagnosed? So split this test into >> tw

Re: [PATCH v2 16/27] t1400: Test one mistake at a time

2014-03-31 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael Haggerty writes: > This case wants to test passing a bad refname to the "update" command. > But it also passes too few arguments to "update", which muddles the > situation: which error should be diagnosed? So split this test into > two: > > * One that passes too few arguments to update >

Re: [PATCH v2 16/27] t1400: Test one mistake at a time

2014-03-26 Thread Brad King
On 03/24/2014 01:56 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty > > t1400: Add a test of "update" with too few arguments > > Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty This looks like a stray squash message. -Brad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in th

[PATCH v2 16/27] t1400: Test one mistake at a time

2014-03-24 Thread Michael Haggerty
This case wants to test passing a bad refname to the "update" command. But it also passes too few arguments to "update", which muddles the situation: which error should be diagnosed? So split this test into two: * One that passes too few arguments to update * One that passes all three arguments