On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>> If we really want to go away from PATH_MAX, is a hard-coded value of 4096 so
>> attractive ?
>> Because we can either
>>
>> a) Re-define PATH_MAX in git-compat-util.h
>> b) Use a
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> If we really want to go away from PATH_MAX, is a hard-coded value of 4096 so
> attractive ?
> Because we can either
>
> a) Re-define PATH_MAX in git-compat-util.h
> b) Use an own #define in git-compat-util.h, like e.g. GIT_PATH_MAX
>
On 2013-12-14 11.54, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> We've been avoiding PATH_MAX whenever possible. This patch avoids
> PATH_MAX in get_pathname() and gives it enough room not to worry about
> really long paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> ---
> path.c | 28 -
We've been avoiding PATH_MAX whenever possible. This patch avoids
PATH_MAX in get_pathname() and gives it enough room not to worry about
really long paths.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
path.c | 28
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --
4 matches
Mail list logo