Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

2018-04-25 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Junio, On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I really want to see that the runtime prefix stuff mature enough during > this cycle, so these follow-up patches are all very much appreciated. FWIW I merged these patches (including my touch-ups) into Git for Windows' `master` branch early.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

2018-04-24 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > Thank you, and sorry for the trouble. I am just too used to a Continuous > Integration setting with exactly one integration branch. Fixing problems close to the source (i.e. picking an appropriately aged base) and making sure everthing works near the tip ala CI styl

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

2018-04-24 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Junio, On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > >>> base-commit: b46fe60e1d7235603a29499822493bd3791195da > >> > >> Basing your work on the tip of 'next' is good for discussion, but > >> not readily usable for final application.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

2018-04-23 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >>> base-commit: b46fe60e1d7235603a29499822493bd3791195da >> >> Basing your work on the tip of 'next' is good for discussion, but >> not readily usable for final application. Let me see if I can >> untangle the dependents to come up with a reaso

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

2018-04-23 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: >> base-commit: b46fe60e1d7235603a29499822493bd3791195da > > Basing your work on the tip of 'next' is good for discussion, but > not readily usable for final application. Let me see if I can > untangle the dependents to come up with a reasonable base. I'll queue this on t

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

2018-04-23 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > We carried a slightly different version of the git_setup_gettext() patch > (which took care of releasing the buffer allocated by system_path()), > and we carry two more patches that touch the same area, so now that > dj/runtime-prefix hit `next`, it seems a good time

[PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

2018-04-21 Thread Johannes Schindelin
We carried a slightly different version of the git_setup_gettext() patch (which took care of releasing the buffer allocated by system_path()), and we carry two more patches that touch the same area, so now that dj/runtime-prefix hit `next`, it seems a good time to contribute those, too. Changes si