Torsten Bögershausen writes:
>> Hmph, would it still make sense to make sure that CRLF will stay CRLF
>> so that future changes to break this expectation can be caught? Not
>> that such a breakage is likely...
>
> Thanks for amending.
>
> We have the file CRLF (and CRLFmixLF), where we check tha
On 2015-04-25 18.41, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Torsten Bögershausen writes:
>
>> "new safer autocrlf handling":
>> Check if eols in a file are converted at commit, when the file has
>> CR (or CLLF) in the repo (technically speaking in the index).
>
> s/CLLF/CRLF/? (no need to resend for this;
Torsten Bögershausen writes:
> "new safer autocrlf handling":
> Check if eols in a file are converted at commit, when the file has
> CR (or CLLF) in the repo (technically speaking in the index).
s/CLLF/CRLF/? (no need to resend for this; I'll locally amend)
> Add a test-file repoMIX with
Hi Torsten,
On 2015-04-25 08:47, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> "new safer autocrlf handling":
> Check if eols in a file are converted at commit, when the file has
> CR (or CLLF) in the repo (technically speaking in the index).
> Add a test-file repoMIX with mixed line-endings.
> When conve
"new safer autocrlf handling":
Check if eols in a file are converted at commit, when the file has
CR (or CLLF) in the repo (technically speaking in the index).
Add a test-file repoMIX with mixed line-endings.
When converting LF->CRLF or CRLF->LF: check the warnings
checkout_files():
Chec
5 matches
Mail list logo