On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:21:39PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > ...
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Haggerty
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff King
> > ---
> > Sorry for the quick v2; Michael and I crossed emails off-list, and I
> > missed some of his review. This version has some min
Jeff King writes:
> ...
> Reviewed-by: Michael Haggerty
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King
> ---
> Sorry for the quick v2; Michael and I crossed emails off-list, and I
> missed some of his review. This version has some minor style and comment
> fixups.
Looks sensible from a cursory read, but it confli
Jeff King writes:
> ...
> Reviewed-by: Michael Haggerty
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King
> ---
> Sorry for the quick v2; Michael and I crossed emails off-list, and I
> missed some of his review. This version has some minor style and comment
> fixups.
Looks sensible from a cursory read, but it confli
Our filesystem ref storage does not allow D/F conflicts; so
if "refs/heads/a/b" exists, we do not allow "refs/heads/a"
to exist (and vice versa). This falls out naturally for
loose refs, where the filesystem enforces the condition. But
for packed-refs, we have to make the check ourselves.
We do so
4 matches
Mail list logo
