On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:12:07PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>> > To ensure that all depths start at 0, that commit changed
>> > calls to xmalloc the object_entry list into calls to
>> >
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:12:07PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> > To ensure that all depths start at 0, that commit changed
> > calls to xmalloc the object_entry list into calls to
> > xcalloc. However, it forgot that we grow the list with
>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> To ensure that all depths start at 0, that commit changed
> calls to xmalloc the object_entry list into calls to
> xcalloc. However, it forgot that we grow the list with
> xrealloc later. These extra entries are used when we add an
> object fro
Thomas Rast writes:
> It apparently relates to the use of .idx.offset to compute the "next"
> offset, cf. append_obj_to_pack():
>
> struct object_entry *obj = &objects[nr_objects++];
>...
> obj[1].idx.offset = obj[0].idx.offset + n;
> obj[1].idx.offset += write_compressed(f,
Jeff King writes:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:52:44AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> > > > Commit 38a4556 (index-pack: start learning to emulate
>> > > > "verify-pack -v", 2011-06-03) added a "delta_depth" counter
>> > > > to each "struct object_entry". Initially, all object entries
>> > > > have
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:52:44AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > > > Commit 38a4556 (index-pack: start learning to emulate
> > > > "verify-pack -v", 2011-06-03) added a "delta_depth" counter
> > > > to each "struct object_entry". Initially, all object entries
> > > > have their depth set to 0; in re
6 matches
Mail list logo
