g...@matthieu-moy.fr writes:
>> That said, I'd still be OK with it.
>
> I don't have objection either.
FWIW, I do not even buy the "destructive commands should force
spelling things out even more" argument in the first place.
$ git checkout somelongtopicname
$ work work work
$ git ch
Thanks for Cc-ing me, and sorry for not being very responsive these
days :-\.
Jeff King writes:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:40:34PM +, Aaron Greenberg wrote:
>
>> I can appreciate Matthieu's points on the use of "-" in destructive
>> commands. As of this writing, git-merge supports the "-" s
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:40:34PM +, Aaron Greenberg wrote:
> I updated the commit message to include my first email's cover letter
> and cleaned up the test.
Thanks. This one looks good to me.
> I can appreciate Matthieu's points on the use of "-" in destructive
> commands. As of this writ
I updated the commit message to include my first email's cover letter
and cleaned up the test.
Copying Junio, since he also had good comments in the conversation you
linked.
I can appreciate Matthieu's points on the use of "-" in destructive
commands. As of this writing, git-merge supports the "
4 matches
Mail list logo