On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 9:29 PM, David Turner wrote:
> On 06/26/2016 12:27 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:21 PM, David Turner wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/25/2016 10:33 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> + /*
> +* Our connection to the client
David Turner wrote:
> On 06/26/2016 04:53 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
> >David Turner wrote:
> >>On 06/25/2016 10:33 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> + /*
> +* Our connection to the client is blocking since a client
> +* can always be killed by SIGINT or
On 06/26/2016 12:27 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:21 PM, David Turner wrote:
On 06/25/2016 10:33 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
+ /*
+* Our connection to the client is blocking since a
client
+* can always be killed by SIGINT or similar.
On 06/26/2016 04:53 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
David Turner wrote:
On 06/25/2016 10:33 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
+ /*
+* Our connection to the client is blocking since a client
+* can always be killed by SIGINT or similar.
+*/
+
David Turner wrote:
> On 06/25/2016 10:33 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >>+ /*
> >>+* Our connection to the client is blocking since a client
> >>+* can always be killed by SIGINT or similar.
> >>+*/
> >>+ set_socket_blocking_fl
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:21 PM, David Turner wrote:
> On 06/25/2016 10:33 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> +* Our connection to the client is blocking since a
>>> client
>>> +* can always be killed by SIGINT or similar.
>>> +*/
>
On 06/25/2016 10:33 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
+ /*
+* Our connection to the client is blocking since a client
+* can always be killed by SIGINT or similar.
+*/
+ set_socket_blocking_flag(client_fd, 0);
Out of curiosity, do
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:45 PM, David Turner wrote:
> .gitignore | 1 +
> Documentation/git-index-helper.txt | 50 ++
> Makefile | 5 +
> cache.h| 11 ++
> contrib/completion/git-completion.b
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:45 PM, David Turner
> wrote:
>> From: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>>
>> +static void loop(int fd, int idle_in_seconds)
>> +{
>> + assert(idle_in_seconds < INT_MAX / 1000);
>
> This assert may not be very nice t
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:45 PM, David Turner wrote:
> From: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>
> +static void loop(int fd, int idle_in_seconds)
> +{
> + assert(idle_in_seconds < INT_MAX / 1000);
This assert may not be very nice to users setting the value using --exit-after.
--
To unsubscribe from th
From: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Instead of reading the index from disk and worrying about disk
corruption, the index is cached in memory (memory bit-flips happen
too, but hopefully less often). The result is faster read. Read time
is reduced by 70%.
The biggest gain is not having to verify the traili
11 matches
Mail list logo
