On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 13:11 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Turner writes:
>
> > Do folks have any more comments on this version?
>
> Not from me at the moment.
>
> > Do I need to re-roll
> > to replace 11/20 as I proposed and drop 20/20?
>
> FYI, I think I have the one taken from
>
>
David Turner writes:
> Do folks have any more comments on this version?
Not from me at the moment.
> Do I need to re-roll
> to replace 11/20 as I proposed and drop 20/20?
FYI, I think I have the one taken from
Message-Id:
<1463174182-20200-1-git-send-email-dtur...@twopensource.com>
Do folks have any more comments on this version? Do I need to re-roll
to replace 11/20 as I proposed and drop 20/20?
Thanks.
On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 16:19 -0400, David Turner wrote:
> packet_write was causing the sigpipes (by calling write_or_die, which
> intentionally overrides the caller's pref
On do, 2016-05-12 at 16:19 -0400, David Turner wrote:
> This version fixes that. I didn't test on a virtual machine, but I
> did test by adding a sleep().
I can confirm that on my single-cpu test VM, this no longer triggers
errors.
D.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
packet_write was causing the sigpipes (by calling write_or_die, which
intentionally overrides the caller's preferences about signal handling).
This version fixes that. I didn't test on a virtual machine, but I did
test by adding a sleep().
David Turner (9):
pkt-line: add gentle version of pack
5 matches
Mail list logo