Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] convert: missing `LF will be replaced by CRLF

2016-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
tbo...@web.de writes: > From: Torsten Bögershausen > > When the "new safer autocrlf-handling" was introduced in c4805393, the logic > around check_safe_crlf() should have been changed: Should have been changed from what to what? And instead it was changed to which other logic? What is the diff

[PATCH v1 2/2] convert: missing `LF will be replaced by CRLF

2016-08-12 Thread tboegi
From: Torsten Bögershausen When the "new safer autocrlf-handling" was introduced in c4805393, the logic around check_safe_crlf() should have been changed: Once a file has been commited with CRLF (and core.autocrlf is true), line endings are no longer converted by "git add" or "git checkout". The