On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 5:50 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
>>> Not necessarily worth a re-roll.
>>
>> Not that it matters in this case, but just as a bit of Perl rx pedantry,
>> yes his is tighter & more correct. You didn't consider how "." interacts
>> with newlin
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>> Not necessarily worth a re-roll.
>
> Not that it matters in this case, but just as a bit of Perl rx pedantry,
> yes his is tighter & more correct. You didn't consider how "." interacts
> with newlines:
>
> $ perl -wE 'my @rx = (qr/^--./, qr/^--.+$/, qr/^--./
On Fri, Apr 20 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Christian Couder
> wrote:
>> When passing an option '--foo' that it does not recognize, the
>> aggregate.perl script should die with an helpful error message
>> like:
>>
>> unknown option '--foo' at ./aggregate.perl l
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> When passing an option '--foo' that it does not recognize, the
> aggregate.perl script should die with an helpful error message
> like:
>
> unknown option '--foo' at ./aggregate.perl line 80.
>
> rather than:
>
> fatal: Needed a single
When passing an option '--foo' that it does not recognize, the
aggregate.perl script should die with an helpful error message
like:
unknown option '--foo' at ./aggregate.perl line 80.
rather than:
fatal: Needed a single revision
rev-parse --verify --foo: command returned error: 128
While
5 matches
Mail list logo
