Re: [PATCH 5/9] t1308: relax the test verifying that empty alias values are disallowed

Johannes Schindelin writes: > We are about to change the way aliases are expanded, to use the early > config machinery. > > This machinery reports errors in a slightly different manner than the > cached config machinery. > > Let's not get hung up by the precise wording of the message mentioning >

Re: [PATCH 5/9] t1308: relax the test verifying that empty alias values are disallowed

On 06/08, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Brandon, > > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Brandon Williams wrote: > > > On 06/07, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > We are about to change the way aliases are expanded, to use the early > > > config machinery. > > > > > > This machinery reports errors in a slightl

Re: [PATCH 5/9] t1308: relax the test verifying that empty alias values are disallowed

Hi Brandon, On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Brandon Williams wrote: > On 06/07, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > We are about to change the way aliases are expanded, to use the early > > config machinery. > > > > This machinery reports errors in a slightly different manner than the > > cached config machinery

Re: [PATCH 5/9] t1308: relax the test verifying that empty alias values are disallowed

On 06/07, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > We are about to change the way aliases are expanded, to use the early > config machinery. > > This machinery reports errors in a slightly different manner than the > cached config machinery. Not a comment on the patch but just a genuine question: Is there an

[PATCH 5/9] t1308: relax the test verifying that empty alias values are disallowed

We are about to change the way aliases are expanded, to use the early config machinery. This machinery reports errors in a slightly different manner than the cached config machinery. Let's not get hung up by the precise wording of the message mentioning the lin number. It is really sufficient to