On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 06:58:06PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> > And it looks like rchgo[io] always ends the loop on a 0. So it seems
> > like we would just hit that condition again.
>
> Correct...in this loop. But there is another place where `io` is
> incremented unconditionally. In the ve
On 08/04/2016 09:27 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:33AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>
>> The code branch used for the compaction heuristic incorrectly forgot to
>> keep io in sync while the group was shifted. I think that could have
>> led to reading past the end of the rc
On 08/04/2016 08:43 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty writes:
>
>> The code branch used for the compaction heuristic incorrectly forgot to
>> keep io in sync while the group was shifted. I think that could have
>> led to reading past the end of the rchgo array.
>
> I had to read the f
On 08/10/2016 06:58 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 08/04/2016 09:27 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:33AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>>
>>> The code branch used for the compaction heuristic incorrectly forgot to
>>> keep io in sync while the group was shifted. I think tha
Michael Haggerty writes:
> The code branch used for the compaction heuristic incorrectly forgot to
> keep io in sync while the group was shifted. I think that could have
> led to reading past the end of the rchgo array.
I had to read the first sentence three times as "incorrectly forgot"
was a b
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:33AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> The code branch used for the compaction heuristic incorrectly forgot to
> keep io in sync while the group was shifted. I think that could have
> led to reading past the end of the rchgo array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty
The code branch used for the compaction heuristic incorrectly forgot to
keep io in sync while the group was shifted. I think that could have
led to reading past the end of the rchgo array.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty
---
I didn't actually try to verify the presence of a bug, because it
seems
7 matches
Mail list logo