On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 15:37:51 -0700
Stefan Beller wrote:
> These can be combined independently, so would
> you expect the user to expect two options for them?
> For example "--color-moved=zebra" could be split
> into "--skip-small --alternate-blocks"
Yes, this is a good explanation. Reusing your
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 14:03:28 -0700
> Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> Suggested-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
>> (https://public-inbox.org/git/87o9j0uljo@evledraar.gmail.com/)
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
>
> Firstly, I don't know if this is
On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 14:03:28 -0700
Stefan Beller wrote:
> Suggested-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> (https://public-inbox.org/git/87o9j0uljo@evledraar.gmail.com/)
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
Firstly, I don't know if this is the right solution- as written
in the linked e-mail [1], the iss
The new "blocks" mode provides a middle ground between plain and zebra.
It is as intuitive (few colors) as plain, but still has the requirement
for a minimum of lines/characters to count a block as moved.
Suggested-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
(https://public-inbox.org/git/87o9j0uljo@evledraa
4 matches
Mail list logo
