Re: [PATCH 5/5] Add a little script to compare two make perf runs

2014-07-06 Thread Bert Wesarg
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> a justification why the geometric mean is used here would increase my >> confident significantly. > > It's just a standard way to summarize sets of benchmarks. For example SPEC > uses the same approach. No, SPEC would have calculated the geomet

Re: [PATCH 5/5] Add a little script to compare two make perf runs

2014-07-06 Thread Andi Kleen
> a justification why the geometric mean is used here would increase my > confident significantly. It's just a standard way to summarize sets of benchmarks. For example SPEC uses the same approach. Anyways the script is not essential to the rest of the profile feedback feature. Just ignore it i

Re: [PATCH 5/5] Add a little script to compare two make perf runs

2014-07-06 Thread Bert Wesarg
Hi, On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Andi Kleen > > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen > --- > diff-res | 26 ++ > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 diff-res > > diff --git a/diff-res b/diff-res > new file mode 100755 > index 000

[PATCH 5/5] Add a little script to compare two make perf runs

2014-07-04 Thread Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen --- diff-res | 26 ++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) create mode 100755 diff-res diff --git a/diff-res b/diff-res new file mode 100755 index 000..90d57be --- /dev/null +++ b/diff-res @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +#!/usr/bin/python +