On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 09:02:24AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
>
>> > But I really don't want callers to think of it as "unfold". I want it to
>> > be "turn this into something I can parse simply". Hence if we were to
>> > find another case w
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 09:02:24AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
> > But I really don't want callers to think of it as "unfold". I want it to
> > be "turn this into something I can parse simply". Hence if we were to
> > find another case where the output is irregular, I'd feel comfortable
> > cal
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:02:49AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>> > But some of those things are not 1:1 mappings with normalization. For
>> > instance, --json presumably implies --only-trailers. Or are we proposing
>> > to break the whole comm
On 11/08/17 00:10, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:02:49AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>>> But some of those things are not 1:1 mappings with normalization. For
>>> instance, --json presumably implies --only-trailers. Or are we proposing
>>> to break the whole commit message down
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:02:49AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> > But some of those things are not 1:1 mappings with normalization. For
> > instance, --json presumably implies --only-trailers. Or are we proposing
> > to break the whole commit message down into components and output it all
> > as
On 10/08/17 22:10, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:06:40PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
>
Related to this, I wonder if people might want to "normalize" in
different ways later. If that happens, we might regret having called
this option "--normalize" instead of "--o
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:06:40PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
> >> Related to this, I wonder if people might want to "normalize" in
> >> different ways later. If that happens, we might regret having called
> >> this option "--normalize" instead of "--one-per-line" for example.
> >
> > What is
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Christian Couder
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:35:00AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:39:21PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
>
>> > If you prefer the normalized form (and the input was line-broken in a
>> > way that you don't like), then this would convert to your preferred
>> > form. I agree that you co
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:35:00AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>>> > The point of "--only-trailers" is to give a caller an out
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:39:21PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
> > If you prefer the normalized form (and the input was line-broken in a
> > way that you don't like), then this would convert to your preferred
> > form. I agree that you could potentially want the opposite (folding long
> > lines
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:35:00AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> > The point of "--only-trailers" is to give a caller an output
>> > that's easy for them to parse. Getting rid of the
>> > n
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:35:00AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> > The point of "--only-trailers" is to give a caller an output
> > that's easy for them to parse. Getting rid of the
> > non-trailer material helps, but we still may see more
> > c
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> The point of "--only-trailers" is to give a caller an output
> that's easy for them to parse. Getting rid of the
> non-trailer material helps, but we still may see more
> complicated syntax like whitespace continuation. Let's add
> an option to n
The point of "--only-trailers" is to give a caller an output
that's easy for them to parse. Getting rid of the
non-trailer material helps, but we still may see more
complicated syntax like whitespace continuation. Let's add
an option to normalize the output into one "key: value" line
per trailer.
The point of "--only-trailers" is to give a caller an output
that's easy for them to parse. Getting rid of the
non-trailer material helps, but we still may see more
complicated syntax like whitespace continuation. Let's add
an option to normalize the output into one "key: value" line
per trailer.
16 matches
Mail list logo
