Hi Stefan,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
>
> > I wonder whether it would make sense to extend this to tree objects
> > while we are at it, but maybe that's an easy up-for-grabs.
>
> I can look into incorporating that,
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 08:28:54PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> > I wonder whether it would make sense to extend this to tree objects while
> > we are at it, but maybe that's an easy up-for-grabs.
>
> I can look into
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> Sometimes users are given a hash of an object and they want to identify
>> it further (ex.: Use verify-pack to find the largest blobs, but what are
>> these? or [1])
>>
>> T
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
>
> Nicely done, sir!
>
> I wonder whether it would make sense to extend this to tree objects while
> we are at it, but maybe that's an easy up-for-grabs.
>
> Thank you very much!
> Dscho
I'd very much like the same abili
Hi Stefan,
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Stefan Beller wrote:
> Sometimes users are given a hash of an object and they want to identify
> it further (ex.: Use verify-pack to find the largest blobs, but what are
> these? or [1])
>
> The best identification of a blob hash is done via a its path at a
> give
Sometimes users are given a hash of an object and they want to
identify it further (ex.: Use verify-pack to find the largest blobs,
but what are these? or [1])
The best identification of a blob hash is done via a its path at a
given commit, which this implements.
[1] https://stackoverflow.com/que
6 matches
Mail list logo
