Jeff King wrote:
> This is shorter, idiomatic, and it means the compiler does
> not get confused about whether our "e" pointer is valid,
> letting us drop the "e = e" hack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King
> ---
> And it fixes an instance of Linus's "people do not understand pointers"
Heh. Yes, loo
This is shorter, idiomatic, and it means the compiler does
not get confused about whether our "e" pointer is valid,
letting us drop the "e = e" hack.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King
---
And it fixes an instance of Linus's "people do not understand pointers"
from here:
http://meta.slashdot.org/story/
2 matches
Mail list logo