Hi Junio,
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > Okay, so here is the deal: on the development machine where this was
> > developed, I do not have gpg installed. So please take this test case just
> > to make sure that things work as intended for the momen
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Okay, so here is the deal: on the development machine where this was
> developed, I do not have gpg installed. So please take this test case just
> to make sure that things work as intended for the moment.
>
> Before sending the last rebase--helper patch series, I wi
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > Of course I agree that it would be very nice to have a test at a later
> > stage that does exercise GPG if it is available. But would it really
> > be so terrible to have a (simpler, not as complete) test th
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Of course I agree that it would be very nice to have a test at a later
> stage that does exercise GPG if it is available. But would it really be so
> terrible to have a (simpler, not as complete) test that is exercised
> *also* when GPG is *not* available?
What I wo
Hi Junio,
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> >> that has a substring '-S"' in it to ensure that the codepath to
> >> parse --gpg-sign= on the command line of "rebase", and to the
> >> message we see here are working correctly, without actually checking
>
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> that has a substring '-S"' in it to ensure that the codepath to
>> parse --gpg-sign= on the command line of "rebase", and to the
>> message we see here are working correctly, without actually checking
>> if GPG is invoked at all, or if it is invoked the key given by
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > To keep the time t3404 requires short (in this developer's Windows
> > setup, this single test already takes a painful 8 minutes to pass),
> > we avoid a full-blown GPG test and cop out by verifying the mes
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> To keep the time t3404 requires short (in this developer's Windows
> setup, this single test already takes a painful 8 minutes to pass),
> we avoid a full-blown GPG test and cop out by verifying the message
> displayed to the user upon an 'edit' command.
This is a t
To keep the time t3404 requires short (in this developer's Windows
setup, this single test already takes a painful 8 minutes to pass),
we avoid a full-blown GPG test and cop out by verifying the message
displayed to the user upon an 'edit' command.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
t/t3404-
9 matches
Mail list logo
