Re: [PATCH 2/2] t/t9802: explicitly name the upstream branch to use as a base

2013-06-18 Thread Junio C Hamano
Pete Wyckoff writes: > Thanks for finding and fixing this. Great explanation. I > tested it locally too. > > Acked-by: Pete Wyckoff Thanks, both. Queued. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo in

Re: [PATCH 2/2] t/t9802: explicitly name the upstream branch to use as a base

2013-06-18 Thread Pete Wyckoff
bca...@nvidia.com wrote on Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:40 -0700: > From: Brandon Casey > > Prior to commit fa83a33b, the 'git checkout' DWIMery would create a > new local branch if the specified branch name did not exist and it > matched exactly one ref in the "remotes" namespace. It searched > the "rem

[PATCH 2/2] t/t9802: explicitly name the upstream branch to use as a base

2013-06-17 Thread Brandon Casey
From: Brandon Casey Prior to commit fa83a33b, the 'git checkout' DWIMery would create a new local branch if the specified branch name did not exist and it matched exactly one ref in the "remotes" namespace. It searched the "remotes" namespace for matching refs using a simple comparison of the tr