On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Jens Lehmann wrote:
>
> Am 07.07.2014 20:13, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> >
> > So I am not very enthusiastic to see this change myself.
>
> Ok, I understand we do not want to lightly risk false positives. I
> just noticed that I accidentally forgot to sign off this s
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:13:11AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jens Lehmann writes:
>
> > Only the two targets "test-lint-duplicates" and "test-lint-executable" are
> > currently executed when running the test target. This was done on purpose
> > when the TEST_LINT variable was added in 81127
Am 07.07.2014 20:13, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Jens Lehmann writes:
>
>> Only the two targets "test-lint-duplicates" and "test-lint-executable" are
>> currently executed when running the test target. This was done on purpose
>> when the TEST_LINT variable was added in 81127d74. But as this does n
Jens Lehmann writes:
> Only the two targets "test-lint-duplicates" and "test-lint-executable" are
> currently executed when running the test target. This was done on purpose
> when the TEST_LINT variable was added in 81127d74. But as this does not
> include the "test-lint-shell-syntax" target add
Only the two targets "test-lint-duplicates" and "test-lint-executable" are
currently executed when running the test target. This was done on purpose
when the TEST_LINT variable was added in 81127d74. But as this does not
include the "test-lint-shell-syntax" target added the same day in commit
c7ce7
5 matches
Mail list logo