Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> This bug fix also affects the default output (non-short, non-porcelain)
>> of git-status, which is not tested here.
>
> Do you have an example? (In just the commit message would be fine, in
> tests would be even better.)
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ste
Stefan Beller wrote:
> This bug fix also affects the default output (non-short, non-porcelain)
> of git-status, which is not tested here.
Do you have an example? (In just the commit message would be fine, in
tests would be even better.)
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
> ---
> Documentation/git
Suppose I have a superproject 'super', with two submodules 'super/sub'
and 'super/sub1'. 'super/sub' itself contains a submodule
'super/sub/subsub'. Now suppose I run, from within 'super':
echo hi >sub/subsub/stray-file
echo hi >sub1/stray-file
Currently we get would see the following out
> sanity check: What does this do for a "2" line indicating a sub-submodule
> that has been renamed that contains an untracked file? Do we need to
> rely on some other indication to show this as a change?
Oh. :(
In case of 'u' and '2' we need to set DIRTY_SUBMODULE_MODIFIED
additionally. will fi
Stefan Beller wrote:
> Suppose I have a superproject 'super', with two submodules 'super/sub'
> and 'super/sub1'. 'super/sub' itself contains a submodule
> 'super/sub/subsub'. Now suppose I run, from within 'super':
>
> echo hi >sub/subsub/stray-file
> echo hi >sub1/stray-file
>
> Currentl
Suppose I have a superproject 'super', with two submodules 'super/sub'
and 'super/sub1'. 'super/sub' itself contains a submodule
'super/sub/subsub'. Now suppose I run, from within 'super':
echo hi >sub/subsub/stray-file
echo hi >sub1/stray-file
Currently we get would see the following out
6 matches
Mail list logo
