Sorry for the long delay before getting back to this; the other stuff
I was working on took longer than expected.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:42 AM Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2019, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:37 PM Johannes Schindelin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
Hi Elijah,
On Sat, 12 Oct 2019, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:37 PM Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > For the record: I am still a huge anti-fan of splitting `setup` test
> > cases from the test cases that do actual things, _unless_ it is
> > _one_, and _only one_,
Hi Dscho,
Thanks for the reviews!
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:37 PM Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
>
[...]
> > @@ -1980,6 +1990,25 @@ static void get_renamed_dir_portion(const char
> > *old_path, const char *new_path,
> > *end_of_
Hi Elijah,
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Elijah Newren
>
> We allow renaming all entries in e.g. a directory named z/ into a
> directory named y/ to be detected as a z/ -> y/ rename, so that if the
> other side of history adds any files to the directory z/ in
From: Elijah Newren
We allow renaming all entries in e.g. a directory named z/ into a
directory named y/ to be detected as a z/ -> y/ rename, so that if the
other side of history adds any files to the directory z/ in the mean
time, we can provide the hint that they should be moved to y/.
There i
5 matches
Mail list logo