On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Ben Peart wrote:
> Why do you redirect stdout to stderr and then and perform an "echo"
> afterwards? I don't understand what benefit that provides. I removed this
> logic and the test still passes so am confused as to what its purpose is.
Ah -- the "echo" was purely to clean
On 11/9/2017 2:58 PM, Alex Vandiver wrote:
ba1b9caca6 resolved the problem of the fsmonitor data being applied to
the non-base index when reading; however, a similar problem exists
when writing the index. Specifically, writing of the fsmonitor
extension happens only after the work to split the
Alex Vandiver writes:
> ba1b9caca6 resolved the problem of the fsmonitor data being applied to
(from SubmittingPatches)
If you want to reference a previous commit in the history of a stable
branch, use the format "abbreviated sha1 (subject, date)",
with the subject enclosed in a pair of double-
ba1b9caca6 resolved the problem of the fsmonitor data being applied to
the non-base index when reading; however, a similar problem exists
when writing the index. Specifically, writing of the fsmonitor
extension happens only after the work to split the index has been
applied -- as such, the informa
4 matches
Mail list logo