Michael Haggerty writes:
> ... But dc39e09942 added another blurb of code between
> the loop and the cleanup. That blurb sometimes resets `ret` to zero,
> making the cleanup code think that the locking was successful.
> ...
> The fix is simple: instead of just breaking out of the loop, jump
> dir
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 05:16:25PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> The fix is simple: instead of just breaking out of the loop, jump
> directly to the cleanup code. This fixes some tests in t1404 that were
> added in the previous commit.
Nicely explained.
I think that fix makes sense, and match
Since dc39e09942 (files_ref_store: use a transaction to update packed
refs, 2017-09-08), failure to lock a reference has been handled
incorrectly by `files_transaction_prepare()`. If
`lock_ref_for_update()` fails in the lock-acquisition loop of that
function, it sets `ret` then breaks out of that l
3 matches
Mail list logo