Johannes Sixt writes:
> * like function declarations. I.e., the expansion of
> *
> *define_commit_slab(indegree, int);
> *
> - * ends in 'static int stat_indegreerealloc;'. This would otherwise
> + * ends in 'struct indegree;'. This would otherwise
> * be a syntax error according
BTW, these are all instances of duplicated global static variables that
can be found in a standard Linux build.
How I found them? I waded through the error messages produced by compiling
the code base as C++ code for the fun of it (basically CFLAGS='-x c++
-fpermissive').
-- Hannes
--
To un
The gigantic define_commit_slab() macro repeats the definition of a
static variable that occurs earlier in the macro text. The purpose of
the repeated definition at the end of the macro is that it takes the
semicolon that occurs where the macro is used.
We cannot just remove the first definition o
3 matches
Mail list logo
