Hi Junio,
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> Johannes Schindelin writes:
> >>
> >> > The 'invalid tag name' and 'missing tagger entry' warnings can now be
> >> > upgraded to errors by setting recei
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Hi Junio,
>
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>>
>> > The 'invalid tag name' and 'missing tagger entry' warnings can now be
>> > upgraded to errors by setting receive.fsck.invalid-tag-name and
>> > receive.fsck.missing-ta
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > The 'invalid tag name' and 'missing tagger entry' warnings can now be
> > upgraded to errors by setting receive.fsck.invalid-tag-name and
> > receive.fsck.missing-tagger-entry to 'error'.
>
> Hmm, why can'
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> The 'invalid tag name' and 'missing tagger entry' warnings can now be
> upgraded to errors by setting receive.fsck.invalid-tag-name and
> receive.fsck.missing-tagger-entry to 'error'.
Hmm, why can't all warnings promotable to errors, or are the above
two mentioned o
The 'invalid tag name' and 'missing tagger entry' warnings can now be
upgraded to errors by setting receive.fsck.invalid-tag-name and
receive.fsck.missing-tagger-entry to 'error'.
Incidentally, the missing tagger warning is now really shown as a warning
(as opposed to being reported with the "erro
5 matches
Mail list logo