Hi Philip,
On Fri, 4 May 2018, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Johannes Schindelin"
> > From: Thomas Rast
> >
> > These are essentially lifted from https://github.com/trast/tbdiff, with
> > light touch-ups to account for the new command name.
> >
> > Apart from renaming `tbdiff` to `branch-diff
From: "Johannes Schindelin"
From: Thomas Rast
These are essentially lifted from https://github.com/trast/tbdiff, with
light touch-ups to account for the new command name.
Apart from renaming `tbdiff` to `branch-diff`, only one test case needed
to be adjusted: 11 - 'changed message'.
The unde
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, 3 May 2018, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> > From: Thomas Rast
> >
> > These are essentially lifted from https://github.com/trast/tbdiff, with
> > light touch-ups to account for the new command name.
> >
> > Apart from re
Hi Ævar,
On Thu, 3 May 2018, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Thu, May 03 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > *before* the existing emtpy line. And apparently xdiff picks a different
>
> s/emtpy/empty/
Thanks for the spell check!
Dscho
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> From: Thomas Rast
>
> These are essentially lifted from https://github.com/trast/tbdiff, with
> light touch-ups to account for the new command name.
>
> Apart from renaming `tbdiff` to `branch-diff`, only one test case needed
> to be ad
On Thu, May 03 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> *before* the existing emtpy line. And apparently xdiff picks a different
s/emtpy/empty/
From: Thomas Rast
These are essentially lifted from https://github.com/trast/tbdiff, with
light touch-ups to account for the new command name.
Apart from renaming `tbdiff` to `branch-diff`, only one test case needed
to be adjusted: 11 - 'changed message'.
The underlying reason it had to be adju
7 matches
Mail list logo