On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 2:27 PM Eric Sunshine wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 4:50 PM Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> > On 12/10, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 9:04 PM Thomas Gummerer
> > > wrote:
> > > > Move the worktree tests to t24* to adhere to that guideline. We're
> > > > go
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 4:50 PM Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> On 12/10, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 9:04 PM Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> > > Move the worktree tests to t24* to adhere to that guideline. We're
> > > going to make use of the free'd up numbers in a subsequent commit.
> >
> >
On 12/10, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 9:04 PM Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> >
> > The 'git worktree' command used to be just another mode in 'git
> > checkout', namely 'git checkout --to'. When the tests for the latter
> > were retrofitted for the former, the test name was adjusted, but
On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 9:04 PM Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> The 'git worktree' command used to be just another mode in 'git
> checkout', namely 'git checkout --to'. When the tests for the latter
> were retrofitted for the former, the test name was adjusted, but the
> test number was kept, even thou
Thomas Gummerer writes:
> The 'git worktree' command used to be just another mode in 'git
> checkout', namely 'git checkout --to'. When the tests for the latter
> were retrofitted for the former, the test name was adjusted, but the
> test number was kept, even though the test is testing a differ
The 'git worktree' command used to be just another mode in 'git
checkout', namely 'git checkout --to'. When the tests for the latter
were retrofitted for the former, the test name was adjusted, but the
test number was kept, even though the test is testing a different
command now. t/README states:
6 matches
Mail list logo