On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Matthieu Moy writes:
>
>> [ It's cool you're working on this, I'd really like a git-repack in C.
>> That would fix this
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/226458 ]
>>
>> Stefan Beller writes:
>>
>>> From: Nguyễn
On 08/07/2013 05:48 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Matthieu Moy writes:
>>
>> seems overkill to me: why don't you just let cmd_repack call
>> update_server_info(0)?
>
> My feeling exactly. I would rather see a patch that does not touch
> pack-objects at all, and use run_command() interface to spawn
Matthieu Moy writes:
> [ It's cool you're working on this, I'd really like a git-repack in C.
> That would fix this
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/226458 ]
>
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> From: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>>
>> pack-objects learns a few more options to tak
[ It's cool you're working on this, I'd really like a git-repack in C.
That would fix this
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/226458 ]
Stefan Beller writes:
> From: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>
> pack-objects learns a few more options to take over what's been done
> by git-rep
From: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
pack-objects learns a few more options to take over what's been done
by git-repack.sh. cmd_repack() becomes a wrapper around
cmd_pack_objects().
---
Makefile | 2 +-
builtin.h | 1 +
builtin/pack-objects.c | 279 ++
5 matches
Mail list logo