Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:08:37PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King writes:
>>
>> > Changing the interface for get_author_ident_from_commit would be a pain,
>> > but if we just wanted to help filter-branch, we could do something like
>> > this:
>>
>> Yes, that is
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:08:37PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > Changing the interface for get_author_ident_from_commit would be a pain,
> > but if we just wanted to help filter-branch, we could do something like
> > this:
>
> Yes, that is the direction I was alluding
Jeff King writes:
> Changing the interface for get_author_ident_from_commit would be a pain,
> but if we just wanted to help filter-branch, we could do something like
> this:
Yes, that is the direction I was alluding to.
Callers of get_author_ident_from_commit can also do the same and
avoid reb
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:44:01AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > The only ident-parsing function we currently provide is
> > get_author_ident_from_commit. This is not very
> > flexible for two reasons:
> >
> > 1. It takes a commit as an argument, and can't read from
>
Jeff King writes:
> The only ident-parsing function we currently provide is
> get_author_ident_from_commit. This is not very
> flexible for two reasons:
>
> 1. It takes a commit as an argument, and can't read from
> commit headers saved on disk.
>
> 2. It will only parse authors, not com
The only ident-parsing function we currently provide is
get_author_ident_from_commit. This is not very
flexible for two reasons:
1. It takes a commit as an argument, and can't read from
commit headers saved on disk.
2. It will only parse authors, not committers.
This patch provides a mo
6 matches
Mail list logo
