Hi Junio,
On Wed, 15 May 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> >> See a few nits below, none of which are necessarily worth a re-roll.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Junio, do you agree, do you want to fix it up on your side?
>
> I think you'd see all of them in what I've pushed
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> See a few nits below, none of which are necessarily worth a re-roll.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Junio, do you agree, do you want to fix it up on your side?
I think you'd see all of them in what I've pushed out.
>> > +one-off testing you should report the behavior difference
Hi Eric,
On Tue, 14 May 2019, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 5:19 AM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
> wrote:
> > The stash.useBuiltin variable introduced in 90a462725e ("stash:
> > optionally use the scripted version again", 2019-02-25) was turned on by
> > default, but had
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> Thanks for following up on this. LGTM.
Yeah, thanks, both.
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 5:19 AM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
wrote:
> The stash.useBuiltin variable introduced in 90a462725e ("stash:
> optionally use the scripted version again", 2019-02-25) was turned on by
> default, but had no documentation.
>
> Let's document it so that users who run
On Tue, May 14 2019, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Johannes Schindelin
>
> The stash.useBuiltin variable introduced in 90a462725e ("stash:
> optionally use the scripted version again", 2019-02-25) was turned on by
> default, but had no documentation.
>
> Let's document it
From: Johannes Schindelin
The stash.useBuiltin variable introduced in 90a462725e ("stash:
optionally use the scripted version again", 2019-02-25) was turned on by
default, but had no documentation.
Let's document it so that users who run into any stability issues with
the C rewrite know there's
7 matches
Mail list logo
