On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 13:13 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
> > Later on when we introduce the version 2 transport protocol, the
> > capabilities will not be transported in one lone string but each
>
> s/lone/long/, I think.
>
> > capability will be carried in its own pkt
Stefan Beller writes:
> Later on when we introduce the version 2 transport protocol, the
> capabilities will not be transported in one lone string but each
s/lone/long/, I think.
> capability will be carried in its own pkt line.
>
> To reuse existing infrastructure we would either need to join
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:18 AM, David Turner wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 16:34 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> + if (skip_prefix(item->string, "symref", &val)) {
>> + if (!val)
>> + continue;
>
> This if should never happen (skip_prefi
On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 16:34 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> + if (skip_prefix(item->string, "symref", &val)) {
> + if (!val)
> + continue;
This if should never happen (skip_prefix returns 0 in that case). You
probably meant !*val -- but:
Later on when we introduce the version 2 transport protocol, the
capabilities will not be transported in one lone string but each
capability will be carried in its own pkt line.
To reuse existing infrastructure we would either need to join the
capabilities into a single string again later or refac
5 matches
Mail list logo