On 04/02/2014 06:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:58:10PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>>
>>> By the time the "if" block is entered, the lock_file instance from the
>>> main function block is no longer in use, so re-use that one instead of
>>> all
Jeff King writes:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:58:10PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>
>> By the time the "if" block is entered, the lock_file instance from the
>> main function block is no longer in use, so re-use that one instead of
>> allocating a second one.
>>
>> Note that the "lock" varia
On 04/01/2014 09:56 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:58:10PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>
>> By the time the "if" block is entered, the lock_file instance from the
>> main function block is no longer in use, so re-use that one instead of
>> allocating a second one.
>>
>> Note
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:58:10PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> By the time the "if" block is entered, the lock_file instance from the
> main function block is no longer in use, so re-use that one instead of
> allocating a second one.
>
> Note that the "lock" variable in the "if" block used t
By the time the "if" block is entered, the lock_file instance from the
main function block is no longer in use, so re-use that one instead of
allocating a second one.
Note that the "lock" variable in the "if" block used to shadow the
"lock" variable at function scope, so the only change needed is
5 matches
Mail list logo
